@Conference{DBLP:conf/uml/EgyedM99,
  author    = {Alexander Egyed and Nenad Medvidovic},
  title     = {Extending Architectural Representation in UML with View Integration.},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML 1999), Fort Collins, USA},
  year      = {1999},
  pages     = {2-16},
  abstract  = {UML has established itself as the leading OO analysis and design methodology.
	Recently, it has also been increasingly used as a foundation for
	representing numerous (diagrammatic) views that are outside the standardized
	set of UML views. An example are architecture description languages.
	The main advantages of representing other types of views in UML are
	1) a common data model and 2) a common set of tools that can be used
	to manipulate that model. However, attempts at representing additional
	views in UML usually fall short of their full integration with existing
	views. Integration extends representation by also describing interactions
	among multiple views, thus capturing the interview relationships.
	Those inter-view relationships are essential to enable automated
	identification of consistency and conformance mismatches. This work
	describes a view integration framework and demonstrates how an architecture
	description language, which was previously only represented in UML,
	can now be fully integrated into UML.},
  doi       = {10.1007/3-540-46852-8_2},
  file      = {:Conferences\\UML 1999 - Extending Architectural Representation in UML with View Integration\\Extending Architectural Representation in UML with View Integration-preprint.pdf:PDF},
  keywords  = {},
}